EVERYDAY FREE SHIPPING on $25 & up - Excludes marketplace items & rentals.
EVERYDAY FREE SHIPPING on $25 & up - Excludes marketplace items & rentals.
EVERYDAY FREE SHIPPING on $25 & up - Excludes marketplace items & rentals
Search
Comparative Conflict of Laws: Conventions, Regulations and Codes

Comparative Conflict of Laws: Conventions, Regulations and Codes - 09 edition

ISBN13: 978-1599416458

Cover of Comparative Conflict of Laws: Conventions, Regulations and Codes 09 (ISBN 978-1599416458)
ISBN13: 978-1599416458
ISBN10: 159941645X
Cover type:
Edition/Copyright: 09
Publisher: Foundation Press
Published: 2009
International: No

USED
Sold Out
FREE Shipping on $25+
  • Check back soon!
  • 30-Day Returns
  • Condition: Very Good
Sold Out
More Shipping Options

Comparative Conflict of Laws: Conventions, Regulations and Codes - 09 edition

ISBN13: 978-1599416458

Hay

ISBN13: 978-1599416458
ISBN10: 159941645X
Cover type:
Edition/Copyright: 09
Publisher: Foundation Press

Published: 2009
International: No
Summary

This regulations and codes title is designed to assist conflict of laws teachers in taking a comparative approach to the subject. International commercial transaction have become commonplace. Many injuries and deaths have their causes or their victims abroad. It is therefore imperative that the course in conflict of law include study of how foreign countries treat the course's major topics of judicial jurisdiction, choice of law, and recognition and enforcement of judgments. Interesting patterns emerge. Many choice-of-law codes and regulations have, as an exception to applying the law of the place of injury to torts, the law of the common domicile of the parties. In family-law related matters, there is much adherence to citizenship as a party's personal law.domicile of the parties. Many examples could be given of the need for a comparative approach to conflict of laws. These materials, treaties, regulations, and codes from around the world, with questions and comments, will assist in taking that approach. For example, service of process abroad is controlled by a Hague convention. The sanction for not effecting service in accordance with the convention is dismissal of the action. In the landmark opinion setting due process standards for personal jurisdiction, Justice O'Connor stated that an important factor in asserting jurisdiction over a foreign defendant is 'the Federal interest in Governments foreign relations policies.' (Asahi Metal Ind. v. Superior Court, 480 U.S. 102, 115, 107 S.Ct. 1026, 1034 (1987).) A United States court should not give offense to a friendly foreign country by exercising jurisdiction considered exorbitant in the foreign defendant's country. To know whether the basis for jurisdiction is deemed unreasonable in the defendant's country or by widely accepted international standards, it is necessary know the law of that country and those standards. The Commissioners on Uniform State Laws and the American Law Institute proposed a new master choic

List price: $0.00
  • Marketplace
  • From
More Shipping Options